Condemn the humiliation of Dr.B.R.Ambedkar portrait
On the occasion of Mahatma Jotirao Phule and Dr.B.R Ambedkar birth anniversary, on behalf of Bahujan Students’ Front (BSF) has installed three portraits namely Phule, Ambedkar and Komram Bheem (with same size) on 13, April, 2011, at 6-30 pm in old NRS hostel mess. But at 9-00 pm (on the same day) Mr.Venkat Rao (Ph.D Economics) and Manikya Rao (Ph.D Telugu) demanded that BSF members must remove the Ambedkar portrait from the place where it has been installed. But BSF members, in the presence of hostel chairman Mr.Prabhakar (Ph.D), made it clear that they do not want to remove the portrait of Dr. B. R. Ambedkar and requested Mr. Manikya Rao and Mr. Venkata Rao not to resort to such an action. But, after 30 minutes, Ambedkar portrait has been removed by both Mr.Venkataro and Mr. Manikya Rao. When, BSF members questioned the reasons behind their action, their contention is that Venkatrao had already informed Mr. Prabhakar that he intended to put a portrait of Dr. B. R. Ambedkar in the mess hall, so he did not think of others doing the same. Some members of the ASA argued that their organization has the history and tradition of putting portraits of Dr. B. R. Ambedkar for a long time; moreover, they argued the size of their portrait is bigger than that of BSF.The above incident raises serious questions and concerns
Who has the right to put an Ambedkar portrait on the campus? Can one organization or individual claim that they have ownership right over putting the portraits of Dr. B. R. Ambedkar because their organization have the history of putting Ambedkar portraits, and because their portrait is a bigger one?
Is it not humiliating Dr. B. R. Ambedkar, by removing already placed portrait?
Is it not the expression of the dominance, bigotry, narrow-mindedness and arrogance which comes out of numerical strength and ignorance of the group, which led them to remove the Dr. B. R. Ambedkar portrait, which was put by another organization which represents Dalits, backward classes and mionorities (Bahujans)?
Is it the way to carry forward the spirit of Dr. B. R. Amebedkar in the modern institutions?
So, BSF is strongly condemning the removal of Ambedkar portrait and we are looking it as an attack on the true Ambedkarism and democratic values on the campus. Hence, we demand immediate action against the individuals who involved in this incident and putting the original Ambedkar portrait in the same place. And we request all the democratic and progressive students’ organization and individuals to condemn this uncivilized act and support us in getting proper justice.
BSF
Poster on Ganesh Festival
Shivaji-“a legend” replaced by Teddy Bear
Ganesha Chaturthi is being celebrated as a national festival in this
Brahmanical India without any historical basis. The irrational history
of the Vinayaka, written by Brahmans, reveals the strategy of
subjugating the aborigines of India and it’s the agency which is used to
create communal attacks. The birth of Vinayaka is being interpreted
differently in the different brahmanical texts such as Siva Puranam,
Kanda Puranam, Vinayaga Puranam and Thakka Yaga-Parani. It is crystal
clear that the Vinayaka does not have any kind of historical origin. The
whole festival of Ganesha Chaturthi had been started by Peshwa
Balagangadar Tilak in order to strengthen the Brahmanism against the
bahujans and to put an end to the Shudra king Shivaji’s Jayanthi in
1893, which was started by Mahtma Jyoti Rao Phule in 1870 in Pune.
Mahatma Phule says that “the Manuvadi Brahmins divided the aboriginal
rulers of this country in to Shudhras and ati-shudhras”. In order to
bring the hidden history into the fore front, the Father of Social
revolution in India Mahtma Jyoti Rao Phule started the celebrations of
Shivaji Maharaj to commemorate the prosperity of the shudhras under his
rule. Shivaji was killed by the Eurasion Brahmins to perpetuate the
inhuman atrocities against the shudhras in the form of the Caste system
and Untouchability.
On a certain day, Siva’s consort Parvathi went in privately for
bathing. Desirous of appointing a guard, she collected a mass of dirt
from her own physique and ordained it to be a male child. This
dirt-turned lad prevented the entry of Siva when he tried to sneak into
the bathing place. Enraged at the obstruction of the young guard, Siva
cut off the head of that lad. Parvathi took serious objection to this
high-handed brutality and began crying profusely. To assuage her
bitterness, Siva wanted to revive the life of the lad. As the severed
head was not found, he beheaded an elephant and fixed its head on the
trunk of the lad. There is another story about the birth of Vinayaka,
that “both Siva and his divine consort Parvathi saw in person the
co-habitation of a male and female elephant. With the impact gathered
thereby, when Siva himself co-habited with his consort, a child was born
with an elephant-head whom we call Ganesha”. (Shiva Puranam and Kanda
Puranam)
To critique these irrational stories Periyar rose following questions about the birth of Vinayaka:
Is it believable that an elephant head can be fixed on the trunk of the child?
How long hadn’t Parvathi taken bath to produce the quantity of the dust ordained it to be a male child Ganesha?
Wasn’t there a door to their bathroom?
What urgency Shiva had to rush into the bath room, even cutting the guard’s head?
When guard stops Shiva, how justifiable chop guards head?
With body dust, how can woman produce a child? If so, isn’t it against natural process of birth?
Is it scientifically possible for anyone to have an animal head and human body?
As our father of Nation Dr. B.R Ambedkar says
“One can do nothing with the Brahmanic theories except to call them senseless ebullitions of a silly mind”.
“For
no intellectual class has prostituted its intelligence to invent a
philosophy to keep uneducated country men in a perpetual state of
ignorance and poverty as the Brahmins have done in India”
This
is the high time to expound the hidden history of Shivaji and to
sensitize Bahujan Samaj to continue our ancestor’s legacy by following
the path, which was given by our Bahujan Revolutionaries. And we must
rewrite the history to establish egalitarian “Bahujan Samatha Samaj”.
BSF
(All India SC, ST, OBC and Religious Minorities)
----------------------------------------------------------------
REVEALING THE FILTHY RAMA AND RAMAYANA
REVEALING THE FILTHY RAMA AND RAMAYANA
Birth of Rama is to establish the Varna system which is the soul of
inequality
The very birth of Rama is miraculous. To protect the Brahmanical
hegemony, infallible society of VarShrama Dharma society, the Brahmins went
to Brahma and Vishnu to ask in applauding way to kill the Mulnivasis who were
called Asuras ( which means who never take sura or alcohol) and to destrna oy the
society so as to establish the so-called Varna society. Then Vishnu was born in
Rama avatar to full fill the requisitions and desires of Brahmins.
The insoluble scientific birth of Rama and the harassment on Women
by Rama.
Rama is the out-put of Aswameda Yaga where the queen, Kausalya wife
of Dasharatha, was compelled to have sexual intercourse with horse in the
presence of the king, while so-called sacred Vedic Brahmin pundits were
chanting the slokas, mantras. According to Valmiki Ramayana, Sita is the
daughter of Rama because Sita is the daughter of Bhudevi (Earth) who is wife of
Vishnu (Varaha, an incarnation of Vishnu) and Rama is the incarnation of
Vishnu. Coming to another facet of women’s humiliation, this is to be said that
when Viswamitra took Rama and Laxmana to the forest to kill the Mulnivasis
(aborigines). Before Thataki was going to be killed by Rama, to justify the
killing of innocent woman, Viswamitra said to Rama,
sloka “ nahite stri vadakrute gruna kaaryo narottama,
chaaturvarga hitaardaya kartyavyam raajasuna.” Ref:( Balakanda,
Valmiki Ramayana).
-“The sloka says that killing is never an offence to protect the
four fold chatur varna system and it is the duty of a Kshatriya to humiliate
and kill the women as she is the aboriginal, an Indian (Mulnivasi).”
Moreover, Rama didn’t leave his deride kind of nature towards
aboriginal people, nurtured by Brahmanical unethical scriptures. The cruel
stupidity of audacious Rama is clearly explicated in cutting of Shurpanaka
without any rational reason. When Laxmana was proposed to love her, she was
advised to meet Rama to say her propose instead of telling his opinion but Rama
simply cut her ears and nose instead of conveying his view.
Killing of Vali is a vicious attitude of Rama:
Vali and Sugriva were two brothers, belonged to Vanara race, who had
their own kingdom, with the capital as Kishkindha. Vali was reigning at
Kishkindha. Sugriva and Hanuman enthrones Kishkindha by cheating Vali. In order
to capture the throne, Sugriva takes the help of Rama. The Rama killed the
Vali, hiding behind a tree, who was unarmed and who had no quarrel with Rama.
(Riddles of Rama and Krishna, page no 4, by Dr. B.R Ambedkar).
Sita’s subjugation by her Father cum husband “Rama”:
After killing Ravana in Lanka, Rama sent Hanuman to Sita to inform
her that they killed Ravana, instead of going himself to her. On the arrival of
Sita, Rama said that “I suspect your conduct. You must have been spoiled by
Ravana. I conquered you back and I am happy, I have nothing to do with you, you
can go anywhere you want”. At hearing these words of Rama, Sita enters into
fire, to prove her conduct and purity. Rama and the gods were satisfied with
this test of purity, and Rama agrees to take her to Ayodhya. The strange thing
is that no one suspects the conduct and purity of Rama, who was also away from
Sita for ten months, if Sita was suspected for being away from Rama. After
coming to Ayodhya, Sita gets pregnant. Rama was reported by Bhadra of the
gossip in Ayodhya that Sita was conceived from Ravana while she was in Lanka.
By hearing this Rama abandoned Sita, knowing the fact that she was pure and her
conduct was testified in Lanka. When Sita meets Rama after 12 year with her two
children, Kusa and Lava, who were not experienced of their father’s love and
affection for 12 years, Sita was asked once again to testify her conduct by Rama.
Hearing Rama’s words, Sita said “As I never thought of any man except Rama even
in my mind, let mother Earth open and bury me”. Hence it is very obvious that
Sita was intended to die rather than going to a fraudulent person Rama.
The Murder of Shambuka- the shudra:
During Rama’s reign, it was propagated that there were no premature
deaths of Brahmans. But, however it happened that a Brahman’s son died at an
early age. Rama and Narada concluded that, the premature death of Brahmin child
was in consequence of performance of Tapasya (the ascetic exercises or penance)
and reading of Vedas and other religious texts by Shambuka, who was a shudra.
This act of Shambuka was conceived by Rama as an act of violating Brahman’s
dharma and cut off the Shambuka’s head. As a consequence of killing of
Shambuka, the Brahman boy started to breathe again and the Brahman gods praised
Rama for killing Shambuka and
the present manuvadi political parties say that they want to
establish a “Rama Rajya” by which they meant to reinforce Manusmriti in lieu of
Indian constitution written by Dr. Ambedkar,
so it is important for all the SC/ST/OBC to spot the danger ahead
and take the responsibility to establish a value based society where equality,
liberty and fraternity flourishes.
JAI BHEEM!!! JAI PHULE!!!
JAI BUDDHA!!! JAI MULNIVASI!!!
JAGO BAHUJAN LOG!!!! HATAO MANUVADI YONKO!!!!
No comments:
Post a Comment